The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In vivo screening for toxicity-modulating drug interactions identifies antagonism that protects against ototoxicity in zebrafish
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1363545 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ethan Bustad, Emma Mudrock, Elizabeth M. Nilles, Andrea Mcquate, Monica Bergado, Alden Gu, Louie Galitan, Natalie Gleason, Henry C. Ou, David W. Raible, Rafael E. Hernandez, Shuyi Ma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 13% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Nigeria | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,321,090
of 26,512,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,350
of 20,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,886
of 359,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#36
of 623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,512,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.