↓ Skip to main content

Effect of China national centralized drug procurement policy on anticoagulation selection and hemorrhage events in patients with AF in Suining

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of China national centralized drug procurement policy on anticoagulation selection and hemorrhage events in patients with AF in Suining
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1365142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qi Zhang, Ruili Wang, Lei Chen, Wensu Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,757,084
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12,365
of 19,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,195
of 141,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#116
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.