The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Unravelling the therapeutic potential of botanicals against chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): molecular insights and future perspectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1365790 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sicon Mitra, Uttpal Anand, Mimosa Ghorai, Balachandar Vellingiri, Niraj Kumar Jha, Tapan Behl, Manoj Kumar, Radha, Mahipal S. Shekhawat, Jarosław Proćków, Abhijit Dey |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,757,147
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,965
of 20,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,617
of 335,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#22
of 612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.