You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early, precise, and safe clinical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effects of novel agents in the intact human tumor microenvironment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1367581 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth R. Gundle, Karthik Rajasekaran, Jeffrey Houlton, Gary B. Deutsch, Thomas J. Ow, Robert G. Maki, John Pang, Cherie-Ann O. Nathan, Daniel Clayburgh, Jason G. Newman, Elyse Brinkmann, Michael J. Wagner, Seth M. Pollack, Matthew J. Thompson, Ryan J. Li, Vikas Mehta, Bradley A. Schiff, Barry I. Wenig, Paul L. Swiecicki, Alice L. Tang, Jessica L. Davis, Annemieke van Zante, Jessica A. Bertout, Wendy Jenkins, Atticus Turner, Marc Grenley, Connor Burns, Jason P. Frazier, Angela Merrell, Kimberly H. W. Sottero, Jonathan M. J. Derry, Kate C. Gillespie, Bre Mills, Richard A. Klinghoffer |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,310,142
of 25,974,666 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12,607
of 20,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,085
of 305,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#132
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,974,666 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.