The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the protective effectiveness and risk factors of ursodeoxycholic acid on COVID-19 among outpatients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1381830 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Di Li, Qimei Fang, Zhiwei Chen, Jing Tang, Haoling Tang, Nan Cai, Ke Qiu, Mingyang Zhu, Xuemei Yang, Lu Yang, Yujie Yang, Yong Huang, Xiaomei Lei, Huanhuan Zhang, Qiankai Lin, Qiang Mao, Te Xu, Yan Li, Yang Zheng, Mingli Peng, Peng Hu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,623,614
of 26,482,830 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,054
of 20,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,210
of 181,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#19
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,482,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.