The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ganoderma lucidum spore extract improves sleep disturbances in a rat model of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1390294 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yu Qin, Yan Zhao, Xiao Hu, Xi Chen, Yan-Ping Jiang, Xue-Jun Jin, Gao Li, Zhen-Hao Li, Ji-Hong Yang, Guo-Liang Zhang, Su-Ying Cui, Yong-He Zhang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,890,057
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,380
of 20,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,014
of 206,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#14
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.