The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unveiling the mechanisms for the development of rosehip-based dermatological products: an updated review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1390419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana Patricia Oargă, Mihaiela Cornea-Cipcigan, Mirela Irina Cordea |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,552,974
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,683
of 20,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,053
of 337,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#13
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.