Daniela Digles, Alvaro Ingles-Prieto, Vojtech Dvorak, Tamara A. M. Mocking, Ulrich Goldmann, Andrea Garofoli, Evert J. Homan, Alberto Di Silvio, Lucia Azzollini, Francesca Sassone, Mario Fogazza, Felix Bärenz, Antje Pommereau, Yasmin Zuschlag, Jasper F. Ooms, Jeppe Tranberg-Jensen, Jesper S. Hansen, Josefina Stanka, Hubert J. Sijben, Helena Batoulis, Eckhard Bender, Riccardo Martini, Adriaan P. IJzerman, David B. Sauer, Laura H. Heitman, Vania Manolova, Juergen Reinhardt, Alexander Ehrmann, Philipp Leippe, Gerhard F. Ecker, Kilian V. M. Huber, Thomas Licher, Lia Scarabottolo, Tabea Wiedmer, Giulio Superti-Furga
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
25%
Chemistry
1
25%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,916,273
of 26,298,949 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,344
of 20,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,171
of 150,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#21
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,298,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
