↓ Skip to main content

Roles of distinct nuclear receptors in diabetic cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roles of distinct nuclear receptors in diabetic cardiomyopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1423124
Authors

Yangyang Zheng, Yongji Xu, Li Ji, Wenqing San, Danning Shen, Qianyou Zhou, Guoliang Meng, Jiahai Shi, Yun Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#20,759,904
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,831
of 20,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,336
of 140,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#41
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.