The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Therapeutic potential of Chinese medicinal herbs stimulating osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in osteoporosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1423555 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui Wang, Kai Shan, Yan Li, Sinuo Wu, Chunman Zhou, Shan Tao, Meijuan Wang, Xiaochun Kang, Liang Zhou, Zhongxi Lyu, Ningcen Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#20,902,667
of 26,555,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,929
of 20,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,410
of 227,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#72
of 416 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,555,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 416 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.