The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mass spectrometry imaging as a promising analytical technique for herbal medicines: an updated review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1442870 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jinying Zhang, Zhiguo Mao, Ding Zhang, Lin Guo, Hui Zhao, Mingsan Miao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,576,445
of 26,485,427 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,419
of 20,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,059
of 182,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#62
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.