The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interaction of Acinetobacter sp. RIT 592 induces the production of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Exiguobacterium sp. RIT 594
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2024.1456027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anutthaman Parthasarathy, Renata Rezende Miranda, T. J. Bedore, Lizabeth M. Watts, Pavan K. Mantravadi, Narayan H. Wong, Jonathan Chu, Joseph A. Adjei, Amisha P. Rana, Michael A. Savka, Zackery P. Bulman, Eli J. Borrego, André O. Hudson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,555,698
of 26,526,336 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,775
of 20,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,651
of 207,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#44
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,336 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.