↓ Skip to main content

Role of Homoclinic Breathers in the Interpretation of Experimental Measurements, With Emphasis on the Peregrine Breather

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physics, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Homoclinic Breathers in the Interpretation of Experimental Measurements, With Emphasis on the Peregrine Breather
Published in
Frontiers in Physics, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphy.2021.611797
Authors

Alfred R. Osborne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2022.
All research outputs
#18,461,618
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#1,012
of 3,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303,858
of 434,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#52
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.