↓ Skip to main content

Retraction: Numerical Treatment for 3D Squeezed Flow in a Rotating Channel With Soret and Dufour Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physics, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction: Numerical Treatment for 3D Squeezed Flow in a Rotating Channel With Soret and Dufour Effects
Published in
Frontiers in Physics, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphy.2021.687508
Authors

Frontiers Editorial Office

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#778
of 3,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,962
of 431,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#50
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.