↓ Skip to main content

Metasurface-generating high purity narrow linewidth cylindrical vector beams: power scaling and its limitation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physics, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Metasurface-generating high purity narrow linewidth cylindrical vector beams: power scaling and its limitation
Published in
Frontiers in Physics, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphy.2023.1195655
Authors

Haokun Li, Lianghua Xie, Chun Zhang, Rumao Tao, Qiang Shu, Min Li, Benjian Shen, Xi Feng, Lixin Xu, Jianjun Wang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,327,370
of 26,179,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#1,361
of 4,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,500
of 386,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#41
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.