↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative functional imaging with CT perfusion: technical considerations, kinetic modeling, and applications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physics, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative functional imaging with CT perfusion: technical considerations, kinetic modeling, and applications
Published in
Frontiers in Physics, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphy.2023.1246973
Authors

Kevin J. Chung, Danny De Sarno, Ting-Yim Lee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#21,298,216
of 26,154,283 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#1,352
of 4,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,610
of 374,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#27
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,283 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,556 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.