↓ Skip to main content

Eventual Role of Asymptomatic Cases of Dengue for the Introduction and Spread of Dengue Viruses in Non-Endemic Regions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eventual Role of Asymptomatic Cases of Dengue for the Introduction and Spread of Dengue Viruses in Non-Endemic Regions
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2012.00070
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claude Chastel

Abstract

In dengue virus infections the asymptomatic cases are much more frequent than the symptomatic ones, but their true role in the introduction and subsequent spread of dengue viruses in non-endemic regions remains to de clarified. We analyzed data from English and French literatures to assess if viremia in asymptomatic dengue infections might be sufficient to represent a true risk. During outbreaks of dengue a large number of individuals are infected and since viremia levels in symptomatic patients are known to vary by many orders of magnitude, it is reasonable to augur that a proportion of asymptomatic cases might reach levels of viremia sufficient to infect competent mosquitoes. In addition, a number of new ways of contamination in man by dengue viruses were recently described such as blood transfusion, bone marrow transplantation, and nosocomial infections that may be worth considering.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 113 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,761,073
of 23,891,012 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,930
of 14,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,955
of 249,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#39
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,891,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.