↓ Skip to main content

Muscle fatigue and muscle weakness: what we know and what we wish we did

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Muscle fatigue and muscle weakness: what we know and what we wish we did
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Karatzaferi, P. Bryant Chase

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 35 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Engineering 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 38 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#6,672,608
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,217
of 14,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,299
of 284,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#101
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.