The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Henry et al. (2012) homing failure formula, assumptions, and basic mathematics: a comment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2013.00142 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Guez |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 6% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Librarian | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 35% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,017,786
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,731
of 13,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,205
of 280,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#89
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.