↓ Skip to main content

Henry et al. (2012) homing failure formula, assumptions, and basic mathematics: a comment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Henry et al. (2012) homing failure formula, assumptions, and basic mathematics: a comment
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00142
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Guez

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
France 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Lecturer 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 6 35%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 41%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Mathematics 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2014.
All research outputs
#6,017,786
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,731
of 13,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,205
of 280,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#89
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.