↓ Skip to main content

The effects of obesity on skeletal muscle regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
99 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
33 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
302 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of obesity on skeletal muscle regeneration
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00371
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dmitry Akhmedov, Rebecca Berdeaux

Abstract

Obesity and metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes mellitus are accompanied by increased lipid deposition in adipose and non-adipose tissues including liver, pancreas, heart and skeletal muscle. Recent publications report impaired regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle following injury in obese mice. Although muscle regeneration has not been thoroughly studied in obese and type 2 diabetic humans and mechanisms leading to decreased muscle regeneration in obesity remain elusive, the initial findings point to the possibility that muscle satellite cell function is compromised under conditions of lipid overload. Elevated toxic lipid metabolites and increased pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as insulin and leptin resistance that occur in obese animals may contribute to decreased regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle. In addition, obesity-associated alterations in the metabolic state of skeletal muscle fibers and satellite cells may directly impair the potential for satellite cell-mediated repair. Here we discuss recent studies that expand our understanding of how obesity negatively impacts skeletal muscle maintenance and regeneration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 293 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 17%
Student > Master 50 17%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 61 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 13%
Sports and Recreations 18 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Other 38 13%
Unknown 79 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#617,639
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#318
of 15,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,402
of 290,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#7
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.