The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A metabolic link to skeletal muscle wasting and regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2014.00032 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
René Koopman, C. Hai Ly, James G. Ryall |
| Abstract |
Due to its essential role in movement, insulating the internal organs, generating heat to maintain core body temperature, and acting as a major energy storage depot, any impairment to skeletal muscle structure and function may lead to an increase in both morbidity and mortality. In the context of skeletal muscle, altered metabolism is directly associated with numerous pathologies and disorders, including diabetes, and obesity, while many skeletal muscle pathologies have secondary changes in metabolism, including cancer cachexia, sarcopenia and the muscular dystrophies. Furthermore, the importance of cellular metabolism in the regulation of skeletal muscle stem cells is beginning to receive significant attention. Thus, it is clear that skeletal muscle metabolism is intricately linked to the regulation of skeletal muscle mass and regeneration. The aim of this review is to discuss some of the recent findings linking a change in metabolism to changes in skeletal muscle mass, as well as describing some of the recent studies in developmental, cancer and stem-cell biology that have identified a role for cellular metabolism in the regulation of stem cell function, a process termed "metabolic reprogramming." |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 53% |
| Scientists | 11 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 24% |
| Researcher | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,936,380
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,066
of 14,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,135
of 309,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#12
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.