↓ Skip to main content

Could whole-body cryotherapy (below −100°C) improve muscle recovery from muscle damage?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Could whole-body cryotherapy (below −100°C) improve muscle recovery from muscle damage?
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2014.00247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joao B. Ferreira-Junior, Martim Bottaro, Jeremy P. Loenneke, Amilton Vieira, Carlos A. Vieira, Michael G. Bemben

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 21%
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 39 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,086,822
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#584
of 13,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,541
of 228,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#5
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.