The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient stratification and identification of adverse event correlations in the space of 1190 drug related adverse events
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2014.00332 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eva Roitmann, Robert Eriksson, Søren Brunak |
Abstract |
New pharmacovigilance methods are needed as a consequence of the morbidity caused by drugs. We exploit fine-grained drug related adverse event information extracted by text mining from electronic medical records (EMRs) to stratify patients based on their adverse events and to determine adverse event co-occurrences. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 4 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 93 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 18% |
Computer Science | 15 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 19% |
Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,919,373
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,885
of 13,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,205
of 238,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#39
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.