↓ Skip to main content

Electrocardiographic patch devices and contemporary wireless cardiac monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrocardiographic patch devices and contemporary wireless cardiac monitoring
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Fung, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Rahul N. Doshi, Jerold S. Shinbane, Steven K. Carlson, Luanda P. Grazette, Philip M. Chang, Rajbir S. Sangha, Heikki V. Huikuri, Nicholas S. Peters

Abstract

Cardiac electrophysiologic derangements often coexist with disorders of the circulatory system. Capturing and diagnosing arrhythmias and conduction system disease may lead to a change in diagnosis, clinical management and patient outcomes. Standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter monitors and event recorders have served as useful diagnostic tools over the last few decades. However, their shortcomings are only recently being addressed by emerging technologies. With advances in device miniaturization and wireless technologies, and changing consumer expectations, wearable "on-body" ECG patch devices have evolved to meet contemporary needs. These devices are unobtrusive and easy to use, leading to increased device wear time and diagnostic yield. While becoming the standard for detecting arrhythmias and conduction system disorders in the outpatient setting where continuous ECG monitoring in the short to medium term (days to weeks) is indicated, these cardiac devices and related digital mobile health technologies are reshaping the clinician-patient interface with important implications for future healthcare delivery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 188 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Student > Master 15 8%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 25%
Engineering 39 21%
Computer Science 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,759,454
of 25,090,809 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,491
of 15,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,207
of 272,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#4
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,090,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.