↓ Skip to main content

Gas analyzer's drift leads to systematic error in maximal oxygen uptake and maximal respiratory exchange ratio determination

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gas analyzer's drift leads to systematic error in maximal oxygen uptake and maximal respiratory exchange ratio determination
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibai Garcia-Tabar, Jean P. Eclache, José F. Aramendi, Esteban M. Gorostiaga

Abstract

The aim was to examine the drift in the measurements of fractional concentration of oxygen (FO2) and carbon dioxide (FCO2) of a Nafion-using metabolic cart during incremental maximal exercise in 18 young and 12 elderly males, and to propose a way in which the drift can be corrected. The drift was verified by comparing the pre-test calibration values with the immediate post-test verification values of the calibration gases. The system demonstrated an average downscale drift (P < 0.001) in FO2 and FCO2 of -0.18% and -0.05%, respectively. Compared with measured values, corrected average maximal oxygen uptakevalues were 5-6% lower (P < 0.001) whereas corrected maximal respiratory exchange ratio values were 8-9% higher (P < 0.001). The drift was not due to an electronic instability in the analyzers because it was reverted after 20 min of recovery from the end of the exercise. The drift may be related to an incomplete removal of water vapor from the expired gas during transit through the Nafion conducting tube. These data demonstrate the importance of checking FO2 and FCO2 values by regular pre-test calibrations and post-test verifications, and also the importance of correcting a possible shift immediately after exercise.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 17 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 30%