↓ Skip to main content

Mitochondrial Quality Control and Muscle Mass Maintenance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
336 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mitochondrial Quality Control and Muscle Mass Maintenance
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanina Romanello, Marco Sandri

Abstract

Loss of muscle mass and force occurs in many diseases such as disuse/inactivity, diabetes, cancer, renal, and cardiac failure and in aging-sarcopenia. In these catabolic conditions the mitochondrial content, morphology and function are greatly affected. The changes of mitochondrial network influence the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that play an important role in muscle function. Moreover, dysfunctional mitochondria trigger catabolic signaling pathways which feed-forward to the nucleus to promote the activation of muscle atrophy. Exercise, on the other hand, improves mitochondrial function by activating mitochondrial biogenesis and mitophagy, possibly playing an important part in the beneficial effects of physical activity in several diseases. Optimized mitochondrial function is strictly maintained by the coordinated activation of different mitochondrial quality control pathways. In this review we outline the current knowledge linking mitochondria-dependent signaling pathways to muscle homeostasis in aging and disease and the resulting implications for the development of novel therapeutic approaches to prevent muscle loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 356 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 17%
Student > Master 48 13%
Researcher 47 13%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 94 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 5%
Sports and Recreations 19 5%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 105 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,264,100
of 24,916,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#692
of 15,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,368
of 406,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#9
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,916,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.