↓ Skip to main content

Both 3,5-Diiodo-L-Thyronine and 3,5,3′-Triiodo-L-Thyronine Prevent Short-term Hepatic Lipid Accumulation via Distinct Mechanisms in Rats Being Fed a High-Fat Diet

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Both 3,5-Diiodo-L-Thyronine and 3,5,3′-Triiodo-L-Thyronine Prevent Short-term Hepatic Lipid Accumulation via Distinct Mechanisms in Rats Being Fed a High-Fat Diet
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2017.00706
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalba Senese, Federica Cioffi, Pieter de Lange, Cristina Leanza, Liliana F. Iannucci, Elena Silvestri, Maria Moreno, Assunta Lombardi, Fernando Goglia, Antonia Lanni

Abstract

3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3) improves hepatic lipid accumulation by increasing lipid catabolism but it also increases lipogenesis, which at first glance appears contradictory. Recent studies have shown that 3,5-diiodothyronine (T2), a natural thyroid hormone derivative, also has the capacity to stimulate hepatic lipid catabolism, however, little is known about its possible effects on lipogenic gene expression. Because genes classically involved in hepatic lipogenesis such as SPOT14, acetyl-CoA-carboxylase (ACC), and fatty acid synthase (FAS) contain thyroid hormone response elements (TREs), we studied their transcriptional regulation, focusing on TRE-mediated effects of T3 compared to T2 in rats receiving high-fat diet (HFD) for 1 week. HFD rats showed a marked lipid accumulation in the liver, which was significantly reduced upon simultaneous administration of either T3 or T2 with the diet. When administered to HFD rats, T2, in contrast with T3, markedly downregulated the expression of the above-mentioned genes. T2 downregulated expression of the transcription factors carbohydrate-response element-binding protein (ChREBP) and sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) involved in activation of transcription of these genes, which explains the suppressed expression of their target genes involved in lipogenesis. T3, however, did not repress expression of the TRE-containing ChREBP gene but repressed SREBP-1c expression. Despite suppression of SREBP-1c expression by T3 (which can be explained by the presence of nTRE in its promoter), the target genes were not suppressed, but normalized to HFD reference levels or even upregulated (ACC), partly due to the presence of TREs on the promoters of these genes and partly to the lack of suppression of ChREBP. Thus, T2 and T3 probably act by different molecular mechanisms to achieve inhibition of hepatic lipid accumulation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 20%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,994,840
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,064
of 13,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,489
of 316,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#103
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.