Bumseok Namgung, Yan Cheng Ng, Hwa Liang Leo, Joseph M. Rifkind, Sangho Kim
Abstract
Red blood cell (RBC) deformability has a significant impact on microcirculation by affecting cell dynamics. Despite previous studies that have demonstrated the margination of rigid cells and particles in vitro, little information is available on the in vivo margination of deformability-impaired RBCs under physiological flow and hematocrit conditions. Thus, in this study, we examined how the deformability-dependent, RBC migration alters the cell distribution under physiological conditions, particularly in arteriolar network flows. The hardened RBCs (hRBCs) were found to preferentially flow near the vessel walls of small arterioles (diameter = 47.1-93.3 μm). The majority of the hRBCs (63%) were marginated within the range of 0.7R-0.9R (R: radial position normalized by vessel radius), indicating that the hRBCs preferentially accumulated near the vessel walls. The laterally marginated hRBCs maintained their lateral positions near the walls while traversing downstream with attenuated radial dispersion. In addition, the immediate displacement of RBCs while traversing a bifurcation also contributes to the near-wall accumulation of hRBCs. The notable difference in the inward migration between the marginated nRBCs and hRBCs after bifurcations further supports the potential role of bifurcations in the accumulation of hRBCs near the walls.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,959,314
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,737
of 13,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,703
of 438,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#148
of 329 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 329 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
