↓ Skip to main content

Intracranial Pressure Is a Determinant of Sympathetic Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intracranial Pressure Is a Determinant of Sympathetic Activity
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric A. Schmidt, Fabien Despas, Anne Pavy-Le Traon, Zofia Czosnyka, John D. Pickard, Kamal Rahmouni, Atul Pathak, Jean M. Senard

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) is the pressure within thecranium. ICP rise compresses brain vessels and reduces cerebral blood delivery. Massive ICP rise leads to cerebral ischemia, but it is also known to produce hypertension, bradycardia and respiratory irregularities due to a sympatho-adrenal mechanism termed Cushing response. One still unresolved question is whether the Cushing response is a non-synaptic acute brainstem ischemic mechanism or part of a larger physiological reflex for arterial blood pressure control and homeostasis regulation. We hypothesize that changes in ICP modulates sympathetic activity. Thus, modest ICP increase and decrease were achieved in mice and patients with respectively intra-ventricular and lumbar fluid infusion. Sympathetic activity was gauged directly by microneurography, recording renal sympathetic nerve activity in mice and muscle sympathetic nerve activity in patients, and gauged indirectly in both species by heart-rate variability analysis. In mice (n= 15), renal sympathetic activity increased from 29.9 ± 4.0 bursts.s-1(baseline ICP 6.6 ± 0.7 mmHg) to 45.7 ± 6.4 bursts.s-1(plateau ICP 38.6 ± 1.0 mmHg) and decreased to 34.8 ± 5.6 bursts.s-1(post-infusion ICP 9.1 ± 0.8 mmHg). In patients (n= 10), muscle sympathetic activity increased from 51.2 ± 2.5 bursts.min-1(baseline ICP 8.3 ± 1.0 mmHg) to 66.7 ± 2.9 bursts.min-1(plateau ICP 25 ± 0.3 mmHg) and decreased to 58.8 ± 2.6 bursts.min-1(post-infusion ICP 14.8 ± 0.9 mmHg). In patients 7 mmHg ICP rise significantly increases sympathetic activity by 17%. Heart-rate variability analysis demonstrated a significant vagal withdrawal during the ICP rise, in accordance with the microneurography findings. Mice and human results are alike. We demonstrate in animal and human that ICP is a reversible determinant of efferent sympathetic outflow, even at relatively low ICP levels. ICP is a biophysical stress related to the forces within the brain. But ICP has also to be considered as a physiological stressor, driving sympathetic activity. The results suggest a novel physiological ICP-mediated sympathetic modulation circuit and the existence of a possible intracranial (i.e., central) baroreflex. Modest ICP rise might participate to the pathophysiology of cardio-metabolic homeostasis imbalance with sympathetic over-activity, and to the pathogenesis of sympathetically-driven diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 42 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Neuroscience 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 47 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,432,819
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,898
of 15,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,218
of 451,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#71
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.