↓ Skip to main content

High-Intensity Interval Training in Normobaric Hypoxia Leads to Greater Body Fat Loss in Overweight/Obese Women than High-Intensity Interval Training in Normoxia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-Intensity Interval Training in Normobaric Hypoxia Leads to Greater Body Fat Loss in Overweight/Obese Women than High-Intensity Interval Training in Normoxia
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alba Camacho-Cardenosa, Marta Camacho-Cardenosa, Martin Burtscher, Ismael Martínez-Guardado, Rafael Timon, Javier Brazo-Sayavera, Guillermo Olcina

Abstract

A moderate hypoxic stimulus is considered a promising therapeutic modality for several pathological states including obesity. There is scientific evidence suggesting that when hypoxia and physical activity are combined, they could provide benefits for the obese population. The aim of the present study was to investigate if exposure to hypoxia combined with two different protocols of high-intensity interval exercise in overweight/obese women was more effective compared with exercise in normoxia. Study participants included 82 overweight/obese women, who started a 12 week program of 36 sessions, and were randomly divided into four groups: (1) aerobic interval training in hypoxia (AitH; FiO2= 17.2%;n= 13), (2) aerobic interval training in normoxia (AitN;n= 15), (3) sprint interval training in hypoxia (SitH;n= 15), and (4) sprint interval training in normoxia (SitN;n= 18). Body mass, body mass index, percentage of total fat mass, muscle mass, basal metabolic rate, fat, and carbohydrate oxidation, and fat and carbohydrate energy were assessed. Outcomes were measured at baseline (T1), after 18 training sessions (T2), 7 days after the last session (T3), and 4 weeks after the last session (T4). The fat mass in the SitH group was significantly reduced compared with the SitN group from T1 to T3 (p< 0.05) and from T1 to T4 (p< 0.05) and muscle mass increased significantly from T1 to T4 (p< 0.05). Fat mass in the AitH group decreased significantly (p< 0.01) and muscle mass increased (p= 0.022) compared with the AitN group from T1 to T4. All training groups showed a reduction in the percentage of fat mass, with a statistically significant reduction in the hypoxia groups (p< 0.05). Muscle mass increased significantly in the hypoxia groups (p< 0.05), especially at T4. While fat oxidation tended to increase and oxidation of carbohydrates tended to decrease in both hypoxia groups, the tendency was reversed in the normoxia groups. Thus, high-intensity interval training under normobaric intermittent hypoxia for 12 weeks in overweight/obese women seems to be promising for reducing body fat content with a concomitant increase in muscle mass.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 60 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 41 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 66 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,886,639
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,023
of 15,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,103
of 448,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#28
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.