↓ Skip to main content

Galectin-9 Expression Predicts Favorable Clinical Outcome in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Galectin-9 Expression Predicts Favorable Clinical Outcome in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00452
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoxiang Zhou, Lejia Sun, Dan Jing, Gang Xu, Jinmei Zhang, Li Lin, Jingjing Zhao, Zhuoran Yao, Hongfeng Lin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 13%
Chemistry 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,154,996
of 26,187,546 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,360
of 15,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,735
of 343,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#125
of 495 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,187,546 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 495 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.