↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiological Mapping of Experimental Heart Failure: Left and Right Ventricular Remodeling in Transverse Aortic Constriction Is Temporally, Kinetically and Structurally Distinct

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathophysiological Mapping of Experimental Heart Failure: Left and Right Ventricular Remodeling in Transverse Aortic Constriction Is Temporally, Kinetically and Structurally Distinct
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathew J. Platt, Jason S. Huber, Nadya Romanova, Keith R. Brunt, Jeremy A. Simpson

Abstract

A growing proportion of heart failure (HF) patients present with impairments in both ventricles. Experimental pressure-overload (i.e., transverse aortic constriction, TAC) induces left ventricle (LV) hypertrophy and failure, as well as right ventricle (RV) dysfunction. However, little is known about the coordinated progression of biventricular dysfunction that occurs in TAC. Here we investigated the time course of systolic and diastolic function in both the LV and RV concurrently to improve our understanding of the chronology of events in TAC. Hemodynamic, histological, and morphometric assessments were obtained from the LV and RV at 2, 4, 9, and 18 weeks post-surgery. Results: Systolic pressures peaked in both ventricles at 4 weeks, thereafter steadily declining in the LV, while remaining elevated in the RV. The LV and RV followed different structural and functional timelines, suggesting the patterns in one ventricle are independent from the opposing ventricle. RV hypertrophy/fibrosis and pulmonary arterial remodeling confirmed a progressive right-sided pathology. We further identified both compensation and decompensation in the LV with persistent concentric hypertrophy in both phases. Finally, diastolic impairments in both ventricles manifested as an intricate progression of multiple parameters that were not in agreement until overt systolic failure was evident. Conclusion: We establish pulmonary hypertension was secondary to LV dysfunction, confirming TAC is a model of type II pulmonary hypertension. This study also challenges some common assumptions in experimental HF (e.g., the relationship between fibrosis and filling pressure) while addressing a knowledge gap with respect to temporality of RV remodeling in pressure-overload.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,788,094
of 26,375,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,062
of 15,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,009
of 344,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#81
of 480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,375,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.