↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Respiratory-Related Premotor Potentials and Small Perturbations in Ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relationship Between Respiratory-Related Premotor Potentials and Small Perturbations in Ventilation
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna L. Hudson, Marie-Cécile Niérat, Mathieu Raux, Thomas Similowski

Abstract

Respiratory-related premotor potentials from averaged electroencephalography (EEG) over the motor areas indicate cortical activation in healthy participants to maintain ventilation in the face of moderate inspiratory or expiratory loads. These experimental conditions are associated with respiratory discomfort, i.e., dyspnea. Premotor potentials are also observed in resting breathing in patients with reduced automatic respiratory drive or respiratory muscle strength due to respiratory or neurological disease, presumably in an attempt to maintain ventilation. The aim of this study was to determine if small voluntary increases in ventilation or smaller load-capacity imbalances, that generate an awareness of breathing but aren't necessarily dyspneic, give rise to respiratory premotor potentials in healthy participants. In 15 healthy subjects, EEG was recorded during voluntary large breaths (∼3× tidal volume, that were interspersed with smaller non-voluntary breaths in the same trial; in 10 subjects) and breathing with a 'low' inspiratory threshold load (∼7 cmH2O; in 8 subjects). Averaged EEG signals at Cz and FCz were assessed for premotor potentials prior to inspiration. Premotor potential incidence in large breaths was 40%, similar to that in the smaller non-voluntary breaths in the same trial (20%; p > 0.05) and to that in a separate trial of resting breathing (0%; p > 0.05). The incidence of premotor potentials was 25% in the low load condition, similar to that in resting breathing (0%; p > 0.05). In contrast, voluntary sniffs were always associated with a higher incidence of premotor potentials (100%; p < 0.05). We have demonstrated that in contrast to respiratory and neurological disease, there is no significant cortical contribution to increase tidal volume or to maintain the load-capacity balance with a small inspiratory threshold load in healthy participants as detected using event-related potential methodology. A lack of cortical contribution during loading was associated with low ratings of respiratory discomfort and minimal changes in ventilation. These findings advance our understanding of the neural control of breathing in health and disease and how respiratory-related EEG may be used for medical technologies such as brain-computer interfaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 28%
Unspecified 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,523
of 13,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,481
of 331,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#380
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.