↓ Skip to main content

Impaired Myofilament Contraction Drives Right Ventricular Failure Secondary to Pressure Overload: Model Simulations, Experimental Validation, and Treatment Predictions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impaired Myofilament Contraction Drives Right Ventricular Failure Secondary to Pressure Overload: Model Simulations, Experimental Validation, and Treatment Predictions
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Philip, Ryan J. Pewowaruk, Claire S. Chen, Diana M. Tabima, Daniel A. Beard, Anthony J. Baker, Naomi C. Chesler

Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) causes pressure overload leading to right ventricular failure (RVF). Myocardial structure and myocyte mechanics are altered in RVF but the direct impact of these cellular level factors on organ level function remain unclear. A computational model of the cardiovascular system that integrates cellular function into whole organ function has recently been developed. This model is a useful tool for investigating how changes in myocyte structure and mechanics contribute to organ function. We use this model to determine how measured changes in myocyte and myocardial mechanics contribute to RVF at the organ level and predict the impact of myocyte-targeted therapy. Methods: A multiscale computational framework was tuned to model PH due to bleomycin exposure in mice. Pressure overload was modeled by increasing the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and decreasing pulmonary artery compliance (CPA). Myocardial fibrosis and the impairment of myocyte maximum force generation (Fmax) were simulated by increasing the collagen content (↑PVR + ↓CPA + fibrosis) and decreasing Fmax (↑PVR + ↓CPA + fibrosis + ↓Fmax). A61603 (A6), a selective α1A-subtype adrenergic receptor agonist, shown to improve Fmax was simulated to explore targeting myocyte generated Fmax in PH. Results: Increased afterload (RV systolic pressure and arterial elastance) in simulations matched experimental results for bleomycin exposure. Pressure overload alone (↑PVR + ↓CPA) caused decreased RV ejection fraction (EF) similar to experimental findings but preservation of cardiac output (CO). Myocardial fibrosis in the setting of pressure overload (↑PVR + ↓PAC + fibrosis) had minimal impact compared to pressure overload alone. Including impaired myocyte function (↑PVR + ↓PAC + fibrosis + ↓Fmax) reduced CO, similar to experiment, and impaired EF. Simulations predicted that A6 treatment preserves EF and CO despite maintained RV pressure overload. Conclusion: Multiscale computational modeling enabled prediction of the contribution of cellular level changes to whole organ function. Impaired Fmax is a key feature that directly contributes to RVF. Simulations further demonstrate the therapeutic benefit of targeting Fmax, which warrants additional study. Future work should incorporate growth and remodeling into the computational model to enable prediction of the multiscale drivers of the transition from dysfunction to failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,147,354
of 23,298,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,837
of 14,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,658
of 329,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#277
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,298,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.