↓ Skip to main content

A Critical Review of Consumer Wearables, Mobile Applications, and Equipment for Providing Biofeedback, Monitoring Stress, and Sleep in Physically Active Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 15,907)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
511 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
351 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
952 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Critical Review of Consumer Wearables, Mobile Applications, and Equipment for Providing Biofeedback, Monitoring Stress, and Sleep in Physically Active Populations
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00743
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan M. Peake, Graham Kerr, John P. Sullivan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 511 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 952 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 952 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 155 16%
Student > Master 121 13%
Researcher 102 11%
Student > Bachelor 77 8%
Other 51 5%
Other 155 16%
Unknown 291 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 108 11%
Sports and Recreations 105 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 65 7%
Computer Science 64 7%
Psychology 49 5%
Other 200 21%
Unknown 361 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 506. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#54,524
of 26,571,961 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#17
of 15,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,113
of 346,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#1
of 526 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,571,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,907 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 526 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.