↓ Skip to main content

Bid Expression Network Controls Neuronal Cell Fate During Avian Ciliary Ganglion Development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bid Expression Network Controls Neuronal Cell Fate During Avian Ciliary Ganglion Development
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.00797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Koszinowski, Veronica La Padula, Frank Edlich, Kerstin Krieglstein, Hauke Busch, Melanie Boerries

Abstract

Avian ciliary ganglion (CG) development involves a transient execution phase of apoptosis controlling the final number of neurons, but the time-dependent molecular mechanisms for neuronal cell fate are largely unknown. To elucidate the molecular networks regulating important aspects of parasympathetic neuronal development, a genome-wide expression analysis was performed during multiple stages of avian CG development between embryonic days E6 and E14. The transcriptome data showed a well-defined sequence of events, starting from neuronal migration via neuronal fate cell determination, synaptic transmission, and regulation of synaptic plasticity to growth factor associated signaling. In particular, we extracted a neuronal apoptosis network that characterized the cell death execution phase at E8/E9 and apoptotic cell clearance at E14 by combining the gene time series analysis with network synthesis from the chicken interactome. Network analysis identified TP53 as key regulator and predicted involvement of the BH3 interacting domain death agonist (BID). A virus-based RNAi knockdown approach in vivo showed a crucial impact of BID expression on the execution of ontogenetic programmed cell death (PCD). In contrast, Bcl-XL expression did not impact PCD. Therefore, BID-mediated apoptosis represents a novel cue essential for timing within CG maturation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,014,589
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,761
of 13,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,001
of 329,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#278
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.