↓ Skip to main content

The Fibrotic Substrate in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Comparison Between Predictions From Computational Modeling and Measurements From Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Fibrotic Substrate in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Comparison Between Predictions From Computational Modeling and Measurements From Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01151
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick M. Boyle, Joe B. Hakim, Sohail Zahid, William H. Franceschi, Michael J. Murphy, Adityo Prakosa, Konstantinos N. Aronis, Tarek Zghaib, Muhammed Balouch, Esra G. Ipek, Jonathan Chrispin, Ronald D. Berger, Hiroshi Ashikaga, Joseph E. Marine, Hugh Calkins, Saman Nazarian, David D. Spragg, Natalia A. Trayanova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Researcher 7 23%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 35%
Computer Science 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,991,384
of 23,105,443 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,278
of 13,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,534
of 335,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#281
of 473 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,105,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 473 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.