↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous Vitamin C for Cancer Therapy – Identifying the Current Gaps in Our Knowledge

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
44 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous Vitamin C for Cancer Therapy – Identifying the Current Gaps in Our Knowledge
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anitra C. Carr, John Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 177 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 11 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 53 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Unspecified 8 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 58 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#500,292
of 26,047,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#269
of 15,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,468
of 345,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#10
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,047,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.