↓ Skip to main content

EEG Multiscale Complexity in Schizophrenia During Picture Naming

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EEG Multiscale Complexity in Schizophrenia During Picture Naming
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio J. Ibáñez-Molina, Vanessa Lozano, María. F. Soriano, José. I. Aznarte, Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza, M. T. Bajo

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with schizophrenia show cognitive deficits that are evident both behaviourally and with EEG recordings. Recent studies have suggested that non-linear analyses of EEG might more adequately reflect the complex, irregular, non-stationary behavior of neural processes than more traditional ERP measures. Non-linear analyses have been mainly applied to EEGs from patients at rest, whereas differences in complexity might be more evident during task performance. Objective: We aimed to investigate changes in non-linear brain dynamics of patients with schizophrenia during cognitive processing. Method: 18 patients and 17 matched healthy controls were asked to name pictures. EEG data were collected at rest and while they were performing a naming task. EEGs were analyzed with the classical Lempel-Ziv Complexity (LZC) and with the Multiscale LZC. Electrodes were grouped in seven regions of interest (ROI). Results: As expected, controls had fewer naming errors than patients. Regarding EEG complexity, the interaction between Group, Task and ROI indicated that patients showed higher complexity values in right frontal regions only at rest, where no differences in complexity between patients and controls were found during the naming task. EEG complexity increased from rest to task in controls in left temporal-parietal regions, while no changes from rest to task were observed in patients. Finally, differences in complexity between patients and controls depended on the frequency bands: higher values of complexity in patients at rest were only observed in fast bands, indicating greater heterogeneity in patients in local dynamics of neuronal assemblies. Conclusion: Consistent with previous studies, schizophrenic patients showed higher complexity than controls in frontal regions at rest. Interestingly, we found different modulations of brain complexity during a simple cognitive task between patients and controls. These data can be interpreted as indicating schizophrenia-related failures to adapt brain functioning to the task, which is reflected in poorer behavioral performance.     - We measured classical and multiscale Lempel-Ziv Complexity (LZCN and MLZC) of the EEG signal of patients with schizophrenia and controls at rest and while performing a cognitive task.    - We found that patients and controls showed a different pattern of brain complexity depending on their cognitive state (at rest or under cognitive challenge).    - Our results illustrate the value of the MLZC in the characterization of the pattern of brain complexity in schizophrenia on function of frequency bands.    - Nonlinear methodologies of EEG analysis can help to characterize brain dysfunction in schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 15%
Engineering 7 10%
Psychology 6 8%
Computer Science 5 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 31 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,782
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,529
of 13,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,680
of 336,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#348
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.