↓ Skip to main content

Field-Based and Lab-Based Assisted Jumping: Unveiling the Testing and Training Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field-Based and Lab-Based Assisted Jumping: Unveiling the Testing and Training Implications
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01284
Pubmed ID
Authors

James J. Tufano, Jan Malecek, Michal Steffl, Petr Stastny, Vladimir Hojka, Tomas Vetrovsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 18 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#14,436,290
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,124
of 14,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,275
of 338,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#202
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.