The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Short-Term Cardiovascular Response to Short-Radius Centrifugation With and Without Ergometer Exercise
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01492 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana Diaz-Artiles, Thomas Heldt, Laurence R. Young |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 50% |
France | 2 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 10 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,487,501
of 25,935,829 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,727
of 15,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,127
of 357,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#99
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,935,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.