The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dental Pulp Stem Cell Mechanoresponsiveness: Effects of Mechanical Stimuli on Dental Pulp Stem Cell Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2018.01685 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Massimo Marrelli, Bruna Codispoti, Richard M. Shelton, Ben A. Scheven, Paul R. Cooper, Marco Tatullo, Francesco Paduano |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,349,015
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,490
of 14,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,813
of 440,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#229
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.