↓ Skip to main content

Validity and Reliability of a Non-invasive Test to Assess Quadriceps and Hamstrings Strength in Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
54 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and Reliability of a Non-invasive Test to Assess Quadriceps and Hamstrings Strength in Athletes
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, November 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2018.01702
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davide Mondin, Julian A. Owen, Massimo Negro, Giuseppe D’Antona

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 21%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Researcher 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 46 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 43 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 49 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,111,344
of 26,523,931 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#611
of 15,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,037
of 452,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#22
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,523,931 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.