↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of Lead Placement in the Right Ventricle During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. A Simulation Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimization of Lead Placement in the Right Ventricle During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. A Simulation Study
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edison F. Carpio, Juan F. Gomez, Rafael Sebastian, Alejandro Lopez-Perez, Eduardo Castellanos, Jesus Almendral, Jose M. Ferrero, Beatriz Trenor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Computer Science 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,564,321
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#6,801
of 13,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,509
of 445,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#229
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.