The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inconsistency in the Standard of Care–Toward Evidence-Based Management of Exertional Heat Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00108 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuri Hosokawa, Takashi Nagata, Manabu Hasegawa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,406,485
of 26,436,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,806
of 15,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,192
of 369,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#71
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,436,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.