The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Importance of Impact Loading and the Stretch Shortening Cycle for Spaceflight Countermeasures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Gruber, Andreas Kramer, Edwin Mulder, Jörn Rittweger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,199,873
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,203
of 15,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,226
of 357,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#85
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.