↓ Skip to main content

Systems Biology Approaches and Precision Oral Health: A Circadian Clock Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systems Biology Approaches and Precision Oral Health: A Circadian Clock Perspective
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry A. Adeola, Silvana Papagerakis, Petros Papagerakis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 33 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,740,283
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,708
of 15,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,832
of 350,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#248
of 427 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 427 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.