The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Constant-Moderate and High-Intensity Interval Training Have Differential Benefits on Insulin Sensitive Tissues in High-Fat Fed Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00459 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sergio F. Martinez-Huenchullan, Linda A. Ban, Luisa F. Olaya-Agudo, Babu Raja Maharjan, Paul F. Williams, Charmaine S. Tam, Susan V. Mclennan, Stephen M. Twigg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 9 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,957,214
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,924
of 13,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,762
of 349,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#192
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.