↓ Skip to main content

Using the Xenopus Developmental Eye Regrowth System to Distinguish the Role of Developmental Versus Regenerative Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using the Xenopus Developmental Eye Regrowth System to Distinguish the Role of Developmental Versus Regenerative Mechanisms
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2019.00502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cindy X. Kha, Dylan J. Guerin, Kelly Ai-Sun Tseng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 22%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
#20,572,330
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#9,554
of 13,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,819
of 350,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#310
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.