The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiopulmonary Responses to Sub-Maximal Ergometer Exercise in a Hypo-Gravity Analog Using Head-Down Tilt and Head-Up Tilt
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2019.00720 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana Diaz-Artiles, Patricia Navarro Tichell, Francisca Perez |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 29% |
India | 1 | 14% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 14% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 20% |
Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 7 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 24% |
Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,787,018
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,099
of 15,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,378
of 358,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#93
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.